Are there any adults at The Economist? I had 10th grade philosophy students who would write junk like this.More poor people are eating meat around the world. That means they will live longer, healthier lives, but it is bad news for the environmenthttps://t.co/CFpeTTFjC5 pic.twitter.com/W3NGBDxjPd— The Economist (@TheEconomist) August 20, 2019
I'm beginning to get the feeling that this "bad for the environment" hogwash is just a scam by the "haves" to get rid of the "have nots". Is it possible that the people who claim to be concerned about the environment, who tend to be from the affluent class, are using that argument to limit access to affluence by those who are ascendant?